45 Writing Process: Peer Review Literary Analysis

Peer Review Literary Analysis

We are using a Discussion format so that we can peer edit and give feedback.  You will earn points three times on this rubric.  Calendar will help you remember the due dates for each part of the writing process.
Posting:  You will make your Google doc available for comments by your colleagues. Set the link sharing to ON and the access to CAN COMMENT.
  1. The date listed on the assignment is the date that your link will be posted.  This is worth 5 points.
  2. I will grade your Rough Draft.  This is worth 20 points.  You should have a complete analysis of your article with examples of the rhetorical elements as well as an evaluation of the overall article.
  3. Complete Peer Editing.  This is worth 20 points.  You will select two (2) papers.   Write the names of your colleagues on the Discussion posting so that I know whose work you will review.  I will look at their Google docs to see that you are making seven to ten constructive comments or asking good questions on each paper.  Use this as a guide: Link . Your comments or questions will not be evaluative (great job!  terrible!); instead, you will use the rubric to let your colleague know how well you do or do not understand the writing.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ENG101 for Health Sciences Copyright © by Lori Walk; Christine Jones; and Aaron Fried is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book