Instructor Information – Keep hidden from students

Overview

This contextualized book has general information in each of the chapters found in the Table of Contents.
Each chapter has a section at the end called Overview.  This section contains readings and assignments that are suggested for that chapter.  Many of the readings are contextualized in support of these health and wellness topics:

  • The effectiveness of personal feedback/tracking devices (fitbit, Apple watch or other wearable technology)
  • Changing a sedentary lifestyle
  • Sugar, salt, fat and their effect on Metabolic Syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension and Heart Disease
  • Body image
  • Recess or PE classes in K-12
  • Disordered eating
  • Balancing school, work, and life

General Resources for Composition Instructors

How to Personalize

  • Change bitmojis- Click “add media” in red above. Download sticker from Bitmoji.com.  Upload sticker to this page.

  • Contact one of the authors for access to a fully integrated Canvas course shell for ENG101

Peer Review Tools – helping you decide!

For all peer feedback tools:

  • Customizable rubrics and point values
  • All students need to be taught what constitutes “good” feedback
Process Advantages Limitations
Canvas Discussion and Google docs Instructor is able to see each student’s writing process through Google docs

Assignment is created and lives in Canvas

Peer feedback is given via comments on the right side of the Google doc

It is difficulty to assign students to specific reviews

Sometimes students struggle to get the correct SHARE setting in Google docs

It takes a lot of monitoring the first time through to be sure students are doing the right thing

Canvas Peer Review All within Canvas

Can automatically assign reviews

Can manually assign reviews

Can assign multiple reviews

Comments can be added directly onto the student paper (annotation)

Not intuitive for students

Not intuitive for Instructors

Connectivity issues can cause comments to be unsaved.

Cannot edit after saving comments

Grading is not intuitive and takes extra steps.

Review It tool from InSpark Students are guided through the process and use an assignment rubric created by the instructor

Review It is embedded in the Canvas LMS

No late work is accepted

Training for faculty is recommended

Feedback Fruits Option to review their own paper prior to reviewing others.

Can automatically assign reviews

Can manually assign reviews

Can assign multiple reviews

Can send grades to the LMS.

Can include automated grammar feedback from the AI

Can add extensions for late work

Comments can be added directly onto the student paper (annotation)

*Commercial Program – cost to the instructor

Is an LTI that opens a new window.

Set up is not difficult, but is technical.

*As of 4/26/2022 the company promotes “free” access to faculty with required training and a commitment to provide feedback on the tools

 

 

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

ENG101 for Health Sciences Copyright © by Lori Walk; Christine Jones; and Aaron Fried is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book