9.5 Environmental Impacts of Metallic Mineral Mining

Environmental issues can include erosion, formation of sinkholes, loss of biodiversity, and contamination of soil, groundwater and surface water by chemicals from mining processes. In some cases, additional forest logging is done in the vicinity of mines to create space for the storage of the created debris and soil. Contamination resulting from leakage of chemicals can also affect the health of the local population if not properly controlled. Extreme examples of pollution from mining activities include coal fires, which can last for years or even decades, producing massive amounts of environmental damage. [4]

Mining companies in most countries are required to follow stringent environmental and rehabilitation codes in order to minimize environmental impact and avoid impacting human health. These codes and regulations all require the common steps of environmental impact assessment, development of environmental management plans, mine closure planning (which must be done before the start of mining operations), and environmental monitoring during operation and after closure. However, in some areas, particularly in the developing world, government regulations may not be well enforced.[4]

Mine Waste: Tailings

Berkeley Pit & Continental Mine (lower and upper right) & Yankee Doodle Tailings Pond on the left(Butte, Montana, USA)
Figure 9.19 The Butte Mining District has produced gold, silver, copper, molybdenum, manganese, and other metals. At lower right is the Berkeley Pit (Berkeley Mine). At upper right is the Continental Pit (Continental Mine). At left is the Yankee Doodle Tailings Pond.Source: St. John, J. Wikimedia Commons

To extract the ore from rock, ore mills need to crush large volumes of rock. This generates piles of non-economic material, a form of “waste” called tailings. For example, for each ton of copper, 99 tons of waste are generated, the amount of waste is larger for gold and silver.

Tailings can be toxic. Tailings are usually produced as a slurry (mixed with water) and are most commonly dumped into ponds made from naturally existing valleys. These tailing ponds are secured by impoundments (dams or embankment dams). In 2000, it was estimated that 3,500 tailings impoundments existed and that every year, 2 to 5 major failures and 35 minor failures occurred; for example, in the Marcopper mining disaster, at least 2 million tons of tailings were released into a local river.

The tailings and the waste rock at most mines are an environmental liability because they contain pyrite plus small amounts of ore minerals. Thus, besides dam failure, tailings can produce acid drainage. Tailings ponds and waste-rock storage piles must be carefully maintained to ensure their integrity and monitored to ensure that acidic and metal-rich water is not leaking out.

Acid Drainage

Rio tinto river CarolStoker NASA Ames Research Center
Figure 9.20 An acid river flows in Rio Tinto Spain damaging all the native ecosystem. This environment is so extreme that was used by NASA as a Mars analogue. Source: Carol Stocker NASA.

The primary impact of metallic mineral mining comes from the process of mining itself, including disturbance of the land surface, covering of landscapes by tailings impoundments, and increased risk of mass wasting that is accelerated by erosion in the area. In addition, many metal deposits contain pyrite, an uneconomic sulfide mineral, that when placed on waste dumps, may generate acid rock drainage.

Acid rock drainage is toxic water rich in heavy metals and often of low pH (i.e., acidic!) that come from unregulated mining districts. In the presence of oxygenated water, sulfides such as pyrite undergo complex reactions to release metal ions and hydrogen ions, lowering pH to highly acidic levels.
The mining and processing of mined materials typically increase the surface-area-to-volume ratio in the material, causing reactions to occur even faster than what would occur naturally. If not managed properly, these reactions may lead to acidification of streams and groundwater plumes that can carry dissolved toxic metals.
In mines where limestone is a waste rock or carbonate minerals like calcite or dolomite are present, their acid-neutralizing potential helps reduce the likelihood of generating acidic rock drainage. Although this is a natural process, it is very important to isolate mine dumps and tailings from oxygenated water, both to prevent the dissolution of sulfides and subsequent infiltration of sulfate-rich water into waterways. The industry has taken great strides in preventing contamination in recent decades, but earlier mining projects are still causing problems with local ecosystems. [3]

Environmental Regulation of Copper Mining in Arizona

The main environmental protection agencies which govern a mine’s potential to contaminate the local environment include the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). These two agencies, as well as county or other local agencies, ensure that operating mines, as well as mines that have been closed, do not release contaminated or hazardous materials outside of the mine site. Hazardous materials have the potential to leave a mine site through wind, which can carry dust; rain, which can flow in washes and streams; and in the groundwater, which can contaminate the local drinking water.

If hazardous materials or contaminated water were to leave a mine site, mine owners could face very large fines on a daily basis, be rejected for future permits, and even face time in jail. Mines on reservations must meet environmental quality standards set out by the respective reservations. For instance, the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA) has well-defined water and air quality standards, which the mines must comply with. Many of the laws in NNEPA are modeled after the US EPA; companies working in such areas often follow the governing body with the strictest policies to ensure adequate environmental compliance.

If there is no formal tribal environmental protection agency, the mines will be governed by the US EPA. Typically, mining companies will have environmental engineers on staff at the site or use environmental consulting firms to interact with the regulatory agencies.

Apache Tribe Concerns with Mining

Throughout history, tribes have faced displacement, discrimination, and marginalization due to mining on their lands (Ballard, 2003). Environmental health is an important concern for communities living near mine sites. The impacts of mining on sacred and ancestral lands are of concern for tribal communities. Although U.S. laws for the most part protect sacred lands on and off tribal reservations, there are still potential risks for loss. For example, traditional livelihoods may be limited due to lack of access to land and/or destruction of important resources (e.g., mountains, vegetation, wildlife). Tribal communities often rely on natural resources found on sacred lands for cultural, medicinal, and spiritual purposes.

On the Navajo Nation in northeastern Arizona and southeastern Utah, Navajo people living in and near uranium mining areas used mill tailings, a sandy waste containing heavy metals and radium, which is radioactive, to build their traditional earthen homes (hogan), many of which remain in use today (DOE, 2013).

Another example is the nearly 100 sacred and cultural sites of the Tohono O’odham Nation, which may be impacted by the proposed development of the Rosemont Copper Mine in southern Arizona (Tohono O’odham, 2009). A final example is the Oak Flat area east of Superior, AZ, lands sacred to the San Carlos Apache tribe, where Resolution Copper is proposing to mine (Allen, 2015). Innovative mining companies implementing responsible mining have recognized the need for more respectful relationships with tribal nations to ensure that when mining is undertaken, the rights and interests of the People are considered.

 

Rehabilitation

After mining finishes, the mine area must undergo rehabilitation. Waste dumps are contoured to flatten them out, to further stabilize them. If the ore contains sulfides it is usually covered with a layer of clay to prevent access to rain and oxygen from the air, which can oxidize the sulfides to produce sulfuric acid, a phenomenon known as acid mine drainage. This is then generally covered with soil, and vegetation is planted to help consolidate the material. Eventually, this layer will erode, but it is generally hoped that the rate of leaching or acid will be slowed by the cover such that the environment can handle the load of acid and associated heavy metals.

There are no long-term studies on the success of these covers due to the relatively short time in which large-scale open pit mining has existed. It may take hundreds to thousands of years for some waste dumps to become “acid neutral” and stop leaching to the environment. The dumps are usually fenced off to prevent livestock from denuding them of vegetation. The open-pit is then surrounded by a fence, to prevent access, and it generally eventually fills up with groundwater. In arid areas it may not fill due to deep groundwater levels. [4]

definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Dynamic Planet: Exploring Geological Disasters and Environmental Change 2022 Copyright © 2021 by Charlene Estrada, Carolina Michele Londono, Merry Wilson is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book