"

Chapter 8 References

Content from this module was adapted from the following openly licensed sources:

Diener, E. & Lucas, R. E. (2020). Personality traits. In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. Champaign, IL: DEF publishers. Retrieved from http://noba.to/96u8ecgw

Jhangiani, R. (n.d.). Principles of social psychology, 1st international ed. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology

Kelland, M. (2017). Personality theory. OER Commons. Retrieved from https://www.oercommons.org/authoring/22859-personality-theory

Lumen Learning. (n.d.). Boundless psychology. Simple Book Publishing. Retrieved from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-psychology/

Lumen Learning. (n.d.). Introduction to psychology. Retrieved from https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wsu-sandbox/chapter/cultural-understandings-of-personality

OpenStax College. (2014). CNX Psychology. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/contents/4abf04bf-93a0-45c3-9cbc-2cefd46e68cc@4.100:1/Psychology

Rio Salado College. (2020). Psychology and Culture PSY132. Riolearn. https://matrix.riosalado.edu/RioWebApps/Public/Rio.SyllabusDefinition.UI/MiniSyllabusRender.aspx?courseId=PSY132&specialtyCode=&instructionMode=IN&startDate=08-24-2020&termCode=4206&sectionNum=41763

References:

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait names: A psycholexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 211. doi:10.1037/h0093360

Asendorpf, J. B., Warkentin, V., & Baudonnière, P-M. (1996). Self-awareness and other-awareness. II: Mirror self-recognition, social contingency awareness, and synchronic imitation. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 313–321.doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.313

Baumeister, R. F. & Bushman, B. J. (2011). Social psychology and human nature, (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Baumeister, R. F. & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Social psychology and human nature, (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Becker M., Vignoles V. L., Owe E., et al. (2014). Cultural bases for self-evaluation seeing oneself positively in different cultural contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40, 657–75. doi:10.1177/0146167214522836

Benet-Martínez, V. & Karakitapoglu-Aygun, Z. (2003). The interplay of cultural values and personality in predicting life-satisfaction: Comparing Asian- and European-Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 38–61.doi:10.1177/00220221022391

Boysen, S. T. & Himes, G. T. (1999). Current issues and emerging theories in animal cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 683–705. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.683

Brown J. D. (2010). Across the (not so) great divide: Cultural similarities in self‐evaluative processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4, 318–30. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00267.x

Cai H., Sedikides C., Gaertner L., et al. (2011). Tactical self-enhancement in China: Is modesty at the service of self-enhancement in East-Asian culture? Social Psychological and Personality Science 2, 59–64. doi:10.1177/1948550610376599

Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 56, 453–484. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913

Cattell, R. B. (1946). The description and measurement of personality. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & World.

Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593–603. doi:10.1037/a0022389

Cote, J. & Levine, C. (2002). Identity, formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis.

DeAndrea, D. C., Shaw, A. S., & Levine, T. R. (2010). Online language: The role of culture in self-expression and self-construal on Facebook. Journal Of Language And Social Psychology, 29(4), 425-442. doi:10.1177/0261927X10377989

Dixon, J., Jung, I., Selvaraj, S. et al. (2015). Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331–336. doi:10.1038/nature14222

Doherty, M. J. (2009). Theory of mind: How children understand others’ thoughts and feelings. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Eysenck, H. J. (1990). An improvement on personality inventory. Current Contents: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22(18), 20.

Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–673. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90237-J

Eysenck, S. B. G. & Eysenck, H. J. (1963). The validity of questionnaire and rating assessments of extroversion and neuroticism, and their factorial stability. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 51–62. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00861.x

Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Gallup, G. G., Jr. (1970). Chimpanzees: self-recognition. Science, 167, 86–87. doi:10.1126/science.167.3914.86

Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(2), 354–370. doi:10.1037/a0030841

Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, & personality development (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 553–618). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766-794. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ip, G. W. M. & Bond, M. H. (1995). Culture, values, and the spontaneous self-concept. Asian Journal of Psychology, 1, 29-35.

Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S., Gelfank, M., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925-937. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.925

Kim, H. & Markus, H. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 77(4), 785-800. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785

Kurman, J. (2001). Self-enhancement: Is it restricted to individualistic cultures? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1705-1716. doi:10.1177/01461672012712013

Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of self and identity. New York, NY: Guilford.

Maio, G. R. & Olson, J. M. (1998). Attitude dissimulation and persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 182–201. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1348

Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construal. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289-310. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00042

Matsumoto, D. & Juang, L. (2013). Culture and psychology. doi:10.1002/9781118339893.wbeccp142

McCrae, R. R., et al. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561.

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547

McCrae R. R., Costa P. T., Jr., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland J. P., Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29:171–188. doi:10.1177/002202219829100

McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., Child, P., & Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511–520. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.36.5.511

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought. New York, NY: Free Press.

Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3

Povinelli, D. J., Landau, K. R., & Perilloux, H. K. (1996). Self-recognition in young children using delayed versus live feedback: Evidence of a developmental asynchrony. Child Development, 67(4), 1540–1554. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01813.x

Rees, A. & Nicholson, N. (1994). The twenty statement test. In C. Cassell and G. Symon (Eds.), Organizational research methods: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rentfrow, P. J., Gosling, S. D., Jokela, M., Stillwell, D. J., Kosinski, M., & Potter, J. (2013). Divided we stand: Three psychological regions of the United States and their political, economic, social, and health correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 996–1012. doi:10.1037/a0034434

Rochat P. (1995). Early objectification of the self. In: Rochat P. (ed.) The self in infancy: Theory and research, pp 53–72. Amsterdam, Holland: Elsevier.

Ross, M., Xun, W. Q., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). Language and the bicultural self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1040-1050. doi:10.1177/01461672022811003

Sedikides, C., Meek, R., Alicke, M., & Taylor, S. (2013). Behind bars but above the bar: Prisoners consider themselves more prosocial than non-prisoners. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2):396-403. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12060. doi:10.1111/bjso.12060

Sedikides, C. (2020). On the doggedness of self-enhancement and self-protection: How constraining are reality constraints? Self & Identity, 19(3), 251–271. doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1562961

Sedikides C., Gaertner L., & Cai, H. (2015). On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: The case for the universality of self-esteem In Elliot A.J., editor. Advances in motivation science. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; Vol. 2, 185–241.

Stackhouse, M., Rickley, M., Liu, Y., & Taras, V. (2024). Homogeneity, heterogeneity, or independence? A multilevel exploration of Big Five personality traits and cultural values in 40 nations. Personality and Individual Differences, 230, 112795-. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112795

Suzuki, L., Davis, H., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Self‐enhancement and self‐effacement in reaction to praise and criticism: The case of multiethnic youth. Ethos, 36, 78-97. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1352.2008.00005.x.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R.,…Bond, M. H. (2016). Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 966–1000. doi:10.1037/xge0000175

Watkins, D., Akande, A. , Fleming, J., Ismail, M., Lefner, K., Regmi, M., Watson, S., Yu, J., Adair, J., Cheng, C., Gerong, A., McInerney, D., Mpofu, E., Sinch-Sengupta, S., & Wondimu, H. (1998). Cultural dimensions, gender, and the nature of self-concept: A fourteen-country study. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 17-31. doi:10.1080/002075998400583

Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept: Volume 2. Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Yang, K. S. (2006). Indigenous personality research: The Chinese case. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 285–314). New York, NY: Springer.

Zell, E. & Alicke, Mark. (2011). Age and the better‐than‐average effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, (41)1175 – 1188. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00752.x.

Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2020). The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 118–149. doi:10.1037/bul0000218

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

The Connected Mind Copyright © 2025 by Open Maricopa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.