2.1 Alfred Wegener and the Strange Idea of Drifting Continents

Charlene Estrada

Our “Contracting Earth”?

How can we explain the movement of land around us over long periods of time? Sometimes volcanoes spring up when there were previously none. Other times, the ground shakes in certain places. Some areas, like Arizona, are home to amazing mountain ranges and valleys, and others are island destinations. How did we make sense of any of this?

Science is an evolving thing, which means that scientists don’t always get it right. Case in point: until the mid-1900s we believed our planet formed all its breath-taking features by “squeezing” them out! These scientists rightly believed that Earth was a ball of hot, molten material when it first formed in space. Where they went wrong, however, is the belief that the cooling outer shell contracted like a dried-out raisin [1].

Video 2.1.1 Visualize how the contracting Earth hypothesis would explain mountains and valleys on Earth (1:22).

Furthermore, these scientists thought new landscapes formed through a process called isostasy. This process involved the continents and ocean basins sinking and rising up as they experienced changes in density [1].

Video 2.1.2. Isostasy, how does it work? (5:22) Professor Wheeler uses a big aquarium full of water as an analog (model) for the Earth’s mantle and boxes for the Earth’s continental crust.

Continental Drift

Image of Alfred Wegener
Figure 2.1.1. A young Alfred Wegener.




Alfred Wegener (1880-1930) was a German scientist who specialized in meteorology and climatology. He enjoyed fieldwork in Greenland to establish weather monitoring stations and made substantial contributions to climatology. However, as an avid explorer of the planet, he had something to say about how it operated. In 1910, he publicly disagreed with the extent that the role of isostasy played in the Contracting Earth hypothesis. He furthermore noticed some patterns in our world map that led him to propose a radical counter-hypothesis: the concept of Continental Drift. [2].   


Video 2.1.3. Evidence supporting the Continental Drift hypothesis (3:48).


Ever since the first world map, people have noticed the similarities between the coastlines of South America and Africa. Would it be such a stretch to imagine these continents being pushed together like two pieces of a jigsaw puzzle? Indeed, what if all the continents were once merged together at one point as a single landmass, and they broke apart for some reason?

The idea that South America and Africa were once attached as a single landmass was not a new one; Antonio Snider-Pellegrini even did preliminary work on continental separation and matched fossils between the two continents in 1858 [2]. But Wegener’s contribution to this idea was new and interesting in that he collected a tremendous amount of data on these two continents. Let’s review some of this evidence below!


A map of the distribution of fossils that are spread across continents which are now oceans apart.
Figure 2.1.2. One powerful line of evidence that the continents were once together is that ancient fossils of animals and plants spread across regions that are now oceans apart.

The fossils of the ancient life that existed hundreds of millions of years ago have been found along the separate coastlines of not just Africa and South America, but also India, Australia, and Antarctica (see left figure)! These organisms appeared to be exactly the same, but how could they have lived on separate continents? For example, neither the reptile Mesosaurus nor Cynognathus, which were found in South America and Africa, could live in salty ocean water. Therefore, Wegener argued, these animals could not have crossed the ocean to live on the continents if they were always separated. That meant that at one time, the continents had to have been merged as a single landmass!

Those that disagreed with Wegener’s hypothesis made this counterargument: perhaps the continents were in the same configurations hundreds of millions of years ago as they are today. Instead of swimming across deep oceans, these ancient reptiles might have traveled between the continents on narrow land bridges that stretched across the oceans [1]. The only reason we don’t see these land bridges today is because they have sunk down or eroded away.

Which idea makes more sense to you: the continents once being merged together OR the idea of ancient land bridges? Science is about a healthy debate given data and evidence, but Wegener was not done!

Geologic Evidence

Even if ancient reptiles and animals crossed the oceans on land bridges, as Wegener’s opponents argued, there was something that they could not explain: the Geologic Record.

Think of a volcanic eruption, a landslide, a winding river, or a sandy beach. When a layer of rock is deposited, it reflects an environment or event that has happened in the area. Each layer of rock is like a page in a book that each of us can learn to read. Therefore, if one area has a distinct sequence of layers, a trained geologist can tell you that region’s unique history. Let’s keep this “book” metaphor in mind.

Layers of books stacked one on top of another (left) are not so different from layers of rock deposited over time. The oldest layer is on the bottom, and the youngest is on the top.
Figure 2.1.3. Layers of books stacked one on top of another (left) are not so different from layers of rock deposited over time. The oldest layer is on the bottom, and the youngest is on the top.

When Wegener examined the layers of rock between two separate continents, he found something exciting. Places an ocean apart from each other, such as the Appalachians in the United States and the mountains extending through Greenland, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Norway, had the same sequence of rocks. That is essentially finding the same book two continents apart.

What would a reasonable person conclude when finding the same book with two different covers? The same author wrote it. Much in the same spirit, Wegener concluded that these two mountain ranges in North America and Europe actually formed as one chain hundreds of millions of years ago when these two continents were merged. North America and Europe then drifted apart to the place we see them now on the world map.

Climatic Evidence

Let’s not forget that Wegener was a climatologist, and as he traveled the continents, he began to notice some strange patterns in the geologic record. Wegener found indications that places like southern Africa, India, Australia, and the Arabian subcontinent were once glaciated about 250 million years ago. He also discovered fossils of tropical plants in areas north of the Arctic Circle. In short, the rocks and fossils Wegener observed were telling him that places that we know today are cold were once hot, and places that are hot were once cold.

Map of ancient Earth with Pangaea supercontinent assembled with a lot of land localized over the Southern hemisphere. There, the Karoo ice age caused glaciation to cover a significant portion of the landmass.
Figure 2.1.4. The Karoo ice age affected Pangaea in the southern hemisphere (shaded blue), and glaciated areas such as India and South America.

Wegener used these observations to further conclude that the continents must have moved. For example, Wegener knew that glaciers only formed near the poles in the modern-day climate; therefore, he argued that to have glaciers, India, Australia, and Africa must have once been centered on the South Pole. Similarly, today’s Arctic Circle must have once been around the tropics – approximately 23 °N and S along Earth’s latitude to host tropical plant life [3].

Putting the Puzzle Together

After gathering a significant amount of evidence across the world, Alfred Wegener took the bold step of publishing his Continental Drift hypothesis in 1915 in a book entitled Die Entstehung der Kontinente und Ozeane or “The Origin of Continents and Oceans”. In this book, Wegener presents all of his evidence, and asserts that the continents must have once been together in a single landmass called “Ur kontinent” (supercontinent) or “Pangäa” (entire earth). Over large timescales of millions of years, this landmass broke apart, and the continents shifted into the configuration as we know them today.

Video 2.1.4. Recent evidence (post-Wegener) supporting the Continental Drift hypothesis (3:00).

In order to successfully argue for Continental Drift, Wegener also had the monumental task of dismantling the case for the Contracting Earth hypothesis and the popular idea that all ancient life moved across separate continents using narrow land bridges. In his book, Wegener makes the following appeal:

“…where does the truth lie? The Earth at any one time can only have had one configuration. Were there land bridges then, or were the continents separated by broad stretches of ocean, as today? It is impossible to deny the postulate of former land bridges if we do not want to abandon wholly the attempt to understand the evolution of life on earth. But it is also impossible to overlook the grounds on which the exponents of permanence deny the existence of sunken intermediate continents. There clearly remains but one possibility: there must be a hidden error in the assumptions alleged to be obvious.” – Alfred Wegener, The Origin of Continents and Oceans, translated from the Fourth and Revised German Edition by John Biram [4]

Backlash and Legacy

Wegener had no trouble collecting interesting evidence for his idea of continental drift, but his hypothesis had a weak point. In the early 1900s, he and his contemporaries did not understand the Earth’s interior and the structure of the oceans nearly as well as we do today. The mechanism by which he assumed the continents moved was flawed.
Wegener thought that the continents quite literally “drifted” atop the oceans very slowly over periods of millions of years. We might think of each landmass like a boat or iceberg slowly moving across the seas until they collide with another large mass. He proposed the continents might have moved due to the Earth’s rotation, or centrifugal forces. Opposing scientists rightly pointed out that this type of mechanism was improbable; not only would the continents be deformed beyond all recognition from dragging across the ocean floor, but the timeframes he originally proposed were much too short given the age of the fossils.
Unfortunately, the response to Wegener’s hypothesis was vicious. Although some of the backlash was well-founded by the weak mechanism for continental drift, much of it was also biased and xenophobic; American geologists, in particular, often pointed out Wegener’s German nationality and training in climatology.

How Bad Was the Criticism Against Wegener?

“delirious ravings”

“moving crust disease and wandering pole plague.”

“Germanic pseudo­-science”

“wrong for a stranger to the facts he handles to generalize from them”

“utter damned rot” 

Wegener did not back down in this overwhelming criticism, and he never abandoned his idea of continental drift. However, he never did see it receive its due credit by the scientific community. It was not until decades after his death in 1930 that geologists began to truly understand Earth’s oceans and interiors, and realize – perhaps sheepishly – that Wegener was onto something transformative [5,6].

Alfred Wegener’s Final Expedition

The last known image of Alfred Wegener in Greenland before his death. He is in a winter tundra in heavy coats.
Figure 2.1.5. The last known image of Alfred Wegener (pictured left) in Greenland before his death.

Wegener’s scientific contributions were not only in the field of geology. As a climatologist, one of his passions was exploring the north of Greenland, which in the early 1900s had not been completely mapped. Wegener helped establish weather-monitoring stations on Greenland that took many readings of its brutal winter weather. This project became a lifelong love for Wegener despite the deadly risks each expedition posed. In 1928, even though Wegener was approaching his 50s, he departed again to explore northern Greenland. The weather was bad (-76 degrees F) and one of the nearby camps was running low on food. He managed to travel through the terrible weather to resupply the camp on dog sleds, but the success was short-lived. Even with supplies, it was clear that the food would not last long enough for everyone. Therefore, he and another colleague volunteered to go back into the weather in the hopes of traveling to another camp. Wegener died on the journey from a heart attack, and his grave was marked with skis. His brother eventually discovered his body, but the family agreed that Wegener belonged in the field he so loved, and his final resting place has since remained in Greenland. [5,6]




Share This Book